Introduction
The goal of this competition is to get the best combined contact pressure with the application of the pressure sensitive paper provided through successive iterations to improve your mechanical/thermal contact. Getting the last mile of performance is a non trivial task and will test the patience of the most experienced mechanic.
Most people and myself included have approached the problem by lapping IHS and/or sink then tightening sink to where we "think" we have good pressure by indicated temperature readings and we are satisfied if it's tight and we get a couple of degrees of improvement. This best guess method leaves a lot of holes - Are you @ 40 PSI or 60? are you 50% of contact area or 90%?
Having a picture of your mount provides a starting point for resolving weaknesses in your set up that might not be apparent otherwise as you can not see what's going on and with this competitive exercise you will become better at analyzing grease contact problems and pressure issues at a glance.
Test Instructions
The actual test procedure is very simple. Your test kit came with some key envelopes that contain two parts, an A & B plastic film. (
Note: Do Not Do The Test with the Thermal Compound Applied) You have been supplied with enough for three tests.
1. Take 1 each of the A & B Samples and place centered on the IHS with the shiny, smooth or uncoated sides facing the metal on the sink and IHS. The coated or frosted sides should facing each other one is the donor and the other is the print.
2. Mount your sink pretty much as you would normally. Be gentle with the paper and try not to abuse it, use clean hands and handle lightly as it can affect your result.
3. Remove the sink and separate the film, one will have a red/pink impression the other will be blank. Throw away the blank the other is the raw result and should look like the Data point 2 &10 below.
I recommend visiting
Sensor products the film we are using is the
Ultra Low (LLLW) with a range of 28 - 85 PSI or (2 - 6 kg/cm˛) we will try to answer any questions although you may want to talk to one of their engineers on some detail you can email "Michael Duer" <
[email protected]>
http://www.sensorprod.com/pdf/static...lustration.pdf
http://www.sensorprod.com/pdf/static/heat_exchanger.pdf
http://www.sensorprod.com/pdf/static...a_brochure.pdf
http://sensorprod.com/video-gallery/.../pressurex.wmv
Cautions
1. Do not get the film wet
2. Treat the film lightly do not abuse - film is sensitive and too much abuse may disqualify the returned sample.
Quick notes
Return the film entry in one of the
key envelopes in one of the
plastic bags provided in the
self addressed envelope provided
You may scan or take a picture of your result and post for comment.
one of the best results I have had is data point #10 a one shot with a waterblock with neither heat sink or IHS lapped.
Provide thermal tests in conjunction with the pressure tests. The winners will be selected solely on their C/P results, The thermal data is useful for comparisons so please provide it.
Hint - Dominant is pressure, so higher pressure increases contact.
May the best mechanic win
Background
As most experienced users understand that when troubleshooting thermal problems there are usually 3 areas of concern.
1.) Pressure
2.) Contact
3.) Application
Taking a thermal measurement on it's own is not enough without a relative basis of comparison. Application and use of thermal compound is a mechanical function though many electronically oriented people tend to attach little importance to mechanical measurements.
Every thermal compound has it's own unique ideal pressure/thermal performance curve. A highly liquid retail compound with great contact resistance will test well at low or moderate pressures as they hit their Bond line thickness (BLT) or average thickness relatively easily but since they are at optimum at these lower pressures adding more pressure fails to yield much of an improvement.
IC Diamond is of a much higher viscosity and has a very different pressure/ performance curve than a more liquid retail compound so at lower pressures and/or contact thermal results maybe equal or less. In paste reviews the major failure is in quantifying the mechanical aspects of what is being tested, are they @ 35lbs and 50% contact area? or 60lbs 60% contact? And how does that relate to multiple thermal/performance pressure curves of different compounds?
Note: 80% of sampled retail sinks were over 50lbs psi
Quantifying mechanical's is not realistic for the individual user but they get around that by observing multiple user results to mentally average a comparison unlike the individual anecdotal test they have a reference point(s) more or less like we are doing here providing samples for comparison.
I generated the attached charts Below from some forum user tests done awhile ago.
What they show is what most know already - that good C/P provides a good thermal result. What it also shows is that IC Diamond performance margins increase with over 50 psi force and with good contact margins are higher. Pressure is dominant and contact will increase with pressure.
Data point # 2 has weak pressure and poor contact resulting in a + 3.7C increase in temps over the liquid paste. Data point # 10 with great contact and pressure shows a -5C improvement over the more liquid compound. This is a nontrivial approx 9C spread and pretty well explains why people get different results.
Also observe Point # 6 it has a somewhat lower pressure but a higher contact hence the improved thermal
So to optimize your thermal result, apply enough compound, tighten your sink and do some lapping